AGA Family of Websites: Gastro.org
Search
  • Home
  • Clinical Guidance
  • Risk stratification for colorectal cancer screening and post-polypectomy surveillance
Clinical Practice Update

Risk stratification for colorectal cancer screening and post-polypectomy surveillance

Experts provide practical guidance for clinicians regarding the role of endoscopy for recurrent acute and chronic pancreatitis.

Guideline Tool kits

Members only access the guideline tool kits

Best practice advice

1. All individuals with a first-degree relative (defined as a parent, sibling, or child) who was diagnosed with CRC, particularly before the age of 50 years, should be considered at increased risk for CRC.

2. All individuals without a personal history of CRC, inflammatory bowel disease, hereditary CRC syndromes, other CRC predisposing conditions, or a family history of CRC should be considered at average risk for CRC.

3. Individuals at average risk for CRC should initiate screening at age 45 years and individuals at increased risk for CRC due to having a first-degree relative with CRC should initiate screening 10 years before the age at diagnosis of the youngest affected relative or age 40 years, whichever is earlier.

4. Risk stratification for initiation of CRC screening should be based on an individual’s age, a known or suspected predisposing hereditary CRC syndrome, and/or a family history of CRC.

5. The decision to continue CRC screening in individuals older than 75 years should be individualized, based on an assessment of risks, benefits, screening history, and comorbidities.

6. Screening options for individuals at average risk for CRC should include colonoscopy, fecal immunochemical test, flexible sigmoidoscopy plus fecal immunochemical test, multitarget stool DNA fecal immunochemical test, and computed tomography colonography, based on availability and individual preference.

7. Colonoscopy should be the screening strategy used for individuals at increased CRC risk.

8. The decision to continue post-polypectomy surveillance for individuals older than 75 years should be individualized, based on an assessment of risks, benefits, and comorbidities.

9. Risk-stratification tools for CRC screening and post-polypectomy surveillance that emerge from research should be examined for real-world effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in diverse populations (eg, by race, ethnicity, sex, and other sociodemographic factors associated with disparities in CRC outcomes) before widespread implementation.

Resources

Your hub for GI education

Discover upcoming events, webinars and other education to stay current with advances in the GI field.

X